|
Shippers in Hong Kong, Shenzhen and Macau are elated over China's
Ministry of Communication's disapproval of four shipping discussion
agreements' application to collectively raise THC levels in South
China that has been declared by the MOC as being in violation
of NOTICE ON STRENGTHENING SUPERVISION ON LINER CONFERENCES AND
FREIGHT DISCUSSION AGREEMENTS (Decree No. 10 issued by Ministry
of Communication, PRC on March 12, 2007).
The MOC has ordered the IADA, IRA, IRSA and ISAA discussion agreements
to cease all such collective rate-fixing activities for one year
while some of them are to be penalized for their actions.
The collective agreements were filed by the Intra-Asia Discussion
Agreement (IADA), the Informal Rate Agreement (IRA), the Informal
Red Sea Agreement (IRSA) and the Informal South Asia Agreement
(ISAA) to increase THC levels in South China.
| |
Effective Date
|
Existing THC
|
Proposed New THC
|
Increase
|
|
IRA (Far East - Middle East)
|
|
| 20' RMB 370 |
| 40' RMB 560 |
| 20' RF RMB 410 |
| 40' RF RMB 610 |
|
| US$141 (RMB 1,100) |
| US$269 (RMB 2,098) |
| US$181 (RMB 1,412) |
| US$344 (RMB 2,683) |
|
|
ISAA (Far East - South Asia)
|
|
| 20' RMB 370 |
| 40' RMB 560 |
| 20' RF RMB 410 |
| 40' RF RMB 610 |
|
| US$141 (RMB 1,100) |
| US$269 (RMB 2,098) |
| US$181 (RMB 1,412) |
| US$344 (RMB 2,683) |
|
|
IRSA (Far East - Red Sea)
|
|
| 20' RMB 370 |
| 40' RMB 560 |
| 20' RF RMB 410 |
| 40' RF RMB 610 |
|
| US$141 (RMB 1,100) |
| US$269 (RMB 2,098) |
| US$181 (RMB 1,412) |
| US$344 (RMB 2,683) |
|
|
IADA
(Intra - Asia)
|
|
| 20' RMB 370 |
| 40' RMB 560 |
| 20' RF RMB 410 |
| 40' RF RMB 610 |
|
| US$136 (RMB 1,061) |
| US$259 (RMB 2,020) |
| US$176 (RMB 1,373) |
| US$334 (RMB 2,605) |
|
|
When the carriers first introduced THC in China in 2003, it was
already being levied on top of freight rates, and the whole sum
has become purely additional revenue for the carriers since all
the costs at the terminals are covered by all-in freight rates.
"Carriers are far too greedy in seeking to raise THC levels
totally without justification. It is clearly a move to exploit
shippers for the carriers' own benefits. And the amount being
considered is very substantial," said Willy Lin, Chairman
of the Hong Kong Shippers' Council. "Using Shenzhen ports
throughput figures-and only calculating for the particular trade
lanes (intra-Asia) of said carriers--the lines are asking shippers
to fork out RMB3.15 billion more annually."
"The increases would cause great burden to shippers in the
Pearl River Delta at a time when they are already under tremendous
pressure from an adverse trade environment and intense competition
from the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) economic zone and other regions,"
said Toland Lam, Executive Chairman of the Shenzhen Shippers'
Association.
The THC is an unjustifiable cost and the recent action of carriers
to further increase their levels in South China will cause significant
damage to the importing and exporting businesses in the region.
"Shipping lines should clearly not be allowed collective
pricing. The lines use the same collective pricing practices and
charge unreasonably high rates in the transportation of goods
from Macau to Hong Kong for transshipment. Macau shippers have
been shouldering this burden for many years now," said Frank
Tang, Chairman of the Macau Shipper's Association.
Shippers in the region have expressed satisfaction over the MOC's
application of the 'Maritime Regulation of the People's Republic
of China' and that it has provided the level of protection promised
by the regulation when the MOC promulgated the law.
In light of the improper filing as per the Maritime Regulation
of the PRC, the MOC considers that the agreements concluded by
ISAA and IRSA in relation to Chinese ports are invalid and their
agreements on increasing THC level in South China should be cancelled.
Moreover, they cannot conduct such activities in China within
one year and their members cannot consult, establish, and implement
any ISAA and IRSA operation and freight agreements. The MOC will
penalize ISAA, IRSA and their members accordingly, in line with
Article 48 of the Maritime Rule of China.
"Shipping lines have been abusing the market. They continue
to ignore the fact that THC is part of the ocean freight rate.
They demand that shippers pay the THC upfront or else they won't
release the Bill of Lading. This is nothing more than blackmail,"
said Toland Lam of Shenzhen Shippers' Association.
"The MOC's findings clearly demonstrate that shipping lines
should, once and for all, cease collective pricing practices.
It has gone on too long-THC has been increased by double-digit
rates since its introduction in 1990 till 1998," explained
Willy Lin of the HKSC. "And now, they are attempting the
same practices in China. South China shippers are extremely pleased
that the MOC has upheld the spirit of the law which protects shippers'
rights and promotes free market economics. "
|